Fracking in Garrett County: Public Sentiment and Senator Mike McKay’s Stance
The issue of hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, has been a contentious topic in Garrett County, Maryland, for many years. While some view it as an opportunity for economic growth and energy development, the majority of local residents have expressed strong concerns about its potential environmental and health impacts. Over time, opposition to fracking has gained momentum, with many residents advocating for stricter environmental protections and preservation of the region’s natural resources.
In 2017, Maryland became the first state with known natural gas reserves to ban fracking through legislative action. This decision reflected the concerns of many Garrett County citizens, who feared the risks of groundwater contamination, air pollution, and the potential for increased seismic activity. The move was widely supported by environmental groups, health professionals, and community activists who prioritized long-term sustainability over short-term economic gains.
Despite the existing ban, efforts have been made to reconsider the prohibition on fracking. In early 2025, a new bill was introduced in the Maryland legislature, proposing to lift the ban and allow hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas exploration. This legislation has reignited debates in Garrett County and beyond, with strong opinions on both sides of the issue.
Senator Mike McKay, who represents Maryland’s 1st District, including Garrett County, has been a vocal proponent of reconsidering the ban. As a co-sponsor of the recent bill seeking to reinstate fracking, he has argued that responsible energy development could bring economic benefits to the region. He has long maintained that fracking, when properly regulated, has the potential to create jobs, increase state revenues, and provide a domestic energy source. His stance aligns with previous positions he has taken in favor of energy development and resource extraction in Western Maryland.
However, opposition to fracking remains strong among many Garrett County residents. Concerns about water safety, air quality, and the long-term environmental consequences of fracking continue to drive resistance. Many citizens and advocacy groups believe that the risks far outweigh the potential benefits, emphasizing the importance of protecting the county’s natural landscapes, tourism industry, and public health.
As the debate over fracking continues, the future of energy policy in Maryland remains uncertain. With strong voices on both sides, the decision on whether to lift the ban will likely be influenced by public pressure, economic considerations, and evolving environmental research. The coming months will be critical in determining the direction Maryland takes on fracking, and Garrett County will undoubtedly play a central role in the discussion.